Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as WP:G5, more at Sockpuppet investigations/Kashkumar16/Archive. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Incoherent and doesn't have enough sources to prove it passes WP:GNG. This may make WP:CSD but I'm not sure enough, and the creator of the article has already removed a CSD tag (So I wouldn't PROD). Username6892 19:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Username6892 19:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Username6892 19:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:27, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I don’t really understand why someone with this level of English would attempt to write an article, but this effort doesn’t belong here. I can’t find any sources in English to support notability, but if there are non-English sources I’d reconsider my !vote as long as the current text is cleared out and we start again. Mccapra (talk) 21:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't understand what the article is about. Incoherent English, random capitalization of words, sparse punctuation. I'd be surprised if it didn't qualify for CSD under WP:G1. PCN02WPS  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 21:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I can barely understand it, so to me it barely doesn't. Username6892 21:58, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Even if the content were really understandable, this article wouldn't be appropriate given our notability guidelines. Deletion is absolutely the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:29, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * There is already a Draft:Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai and it was moved to mainspace without review so I guess it can be speedily deleted?Jonteemil (talk) 10:43, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I suggest protecting Sri Naga Kanni Amman Temple Thalaivankottai since moving it to draftspace obviously didn't stop the user from editing there.Jonteemil (talk) 10:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The user might get themself blocked anyway. They've already removed a speedy deletion notice and the notice for this AfD twice. Then again, salting is still probably a good idea. Username6892 12:34, 24 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment, article isnt that incoherent (who doesn't like a challenge?:)), there is a problem with a reference (actually the temple's website) imbedded in its incomplete infobox, lots of capitalisation that, although time consuming, could easily be fixed, the section on the temple history/story of the goddess, Naga Kanni, is actually quite interesting, but i digress, the main issue is sourcing that leads to wikinotability. this temple doesn't appear to have any (a gsearch brings up "how to get there" websites, temple facebook page, couple of blogsites, and WP pages. As stated earlier the only reference is to the temple website, so this article is unsourced (all of its content could be considered WP:OR/WP:COPYVIO) with no prospect of improvement that brings us to delete as not meeting WP:GNG. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:58, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note:I've tagged the article with CSD G5 due to the author being a sock (see the SPI casepage) Username6892 14:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Even if there is anything valuable here it still remains unclear. WP:TNT at least apply for now. Ashishkafle (talk) 03:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.