Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Sathya Sai Annapoorna Trust


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. After listing for 24 days there is one support for deletion other than the nominator, and there is one support for keep. The rationale for keep has been rebutted, and a search for reliable sources finds the same promotional coverage as argued by the delete rationales, so I am closing as delete; however, as this is a close call a reasonable request for WP:REFUND will be allowed. SilkTork (talk) 03:30, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Sri Sathya Sai Annapoorna Trust

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NOTNEWS and NCORP failure ; part of a promotional ring around Sai Baba (an area that has been subject to two arbitration cases). &#x222F; WBG converse 13:57, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  &#x222F; WBG converse 13:57, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions.  &#x222F; WBG converse 13:57, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  &#x222F; WBG converse 13:57, 16 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Article's subject meets WP:NGO. Independently notable with media coverage. No  WP:ORGSIG & WP:INHERITORG  inherit. --Gpkp [ u • t • c ] 14:58, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Where are you seeing significant coverage of the NGO (rather than of the milk-program) over the 5 reliable news-pieces at this link? The NGO does not inherit notability for being one of the providers of the fortified milk-powder distributed among school students. &#x222F; WBG converse 15:04, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 15:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:40, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the *organization* and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP, <b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>++ 13:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.