Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Sathya Sai Super Speciality Hospital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:35, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Sri Sathya Sai Super Speciality Hospital

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An unapologetic promotionally written piece, possible created and or maintained by a COI and/or Paid editor who apparently returned after a four year hatius as soon as the csd-spam template was added to contest the deletion on the talk page on humanitarian grounds. Listing for community input, and preemptively conceding that AFD is not cleanup but let's be honest: four years of the cleanup templates and they elicit no action, but the deletion template gets a response? Its pretty clear that it'll be deletion of the status quo, so lets do take that into account here. TomStar81 (Talk) 04:54, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:57, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:58, 12 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete And yes, seriously this garbage was on wiki for four years? — Harshil want to talk? 03:13, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as G11 - Unadulterated spam, per my original tagging; part of the Sai-Baba-walled-garden, that was subject to 2 Arbitration cases, in the wild west days of Wikipedia. FWIW, I spot no minimally significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources except in ; the subject thus fails WP:GEOFEAT. &#x222F; WBG converse 04:46, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, because the hospital+ seems obviously significant/substantial/notable. See the pic here.  The buildings and architect and so on are worth noting.  Sorry to the well-meaning editors here about all the promo that needs to be stripped down.  But, wp:TNTTNT essay, to which I contributed, gives multiple reasons why we should not delete an article on an obviously notable topic, just for it to be created again without the baggage, although wp:TNT argument is attractive. --Doncram (talk) 18:03, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Wot the actual fuck? Where are the sources? &#x222F; WBG converse 11:28, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:INDIA member here. This article is about 2 hospitals. The article needs significant cleanup, but WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  07:46, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , I am a member of WP:INDIA as well but over here, we need sources ..... And how did you add one hospital?! &#x222F; WBG converse 11:29, 18 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.