Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Sri Ayurveda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 11:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Sri Sri Ayurveda

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NCORP. &#x222F; WBG converse 15:16, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 15:32, 22 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Merge to Ravi Shankar (spiritual leader) Art of Living Foundation and redirect. Not notable enough for a standalone article. — kashmīrī  TALK  20:08, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I think merging to Art of Living Foundation is better, because it was the foundation which established this company.--DreamLinker (talk) 13:41, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Source for such claim will be appreciated. While it is clear that it is Ravi Shankar's company, the link with AOL are not clear. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  13:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:44, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:44, 22 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:NCORP also notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. The coverage is largely promotional in nature and based on the Notability of the Subject Ravi Shankar. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  21:11, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - notability not inherited Spiderone  10:36, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge to Art of Living Foundation. This company is part of the Art of Living Foundation. In this case, it is actually the collective foundation which is notable; the company individually is not notable. I think it best mentioned in that article. A couple of sentences would be good enough.--DreamLinker (talk) 13:40, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi DreamLinker, do you have any link/evidence to back up your claim that the company is part of AOL. Please share thanks. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  13:46, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * It's there on the Art of Living website. I am unable to paste the link as it seems to be blacklisted. The format is DreamLinker (talk)
 * OK, I found a better link. rediff. For instance, in 2002, when the Foundation launched a range of Ayurvedic products - everything from medicines to personal care products, under the Sri Sri Ayurveda brandname - volunteers across the world formed an informal direct selling network.--DreamLinker (talk) 13:59, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * DreamLinker, thank you for the kind reply. It is understandable why the link is blocked. I reviewed the link which says that the headquarter of this company is in Art of Living Foundation, So I am ok if other folks believe it should be redirected to AOL. User:Kashmiri would you like to revisit your merge target, please let us know. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  14:02, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Done, thanks :) — kashmīrī  TALK  14:37, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * You are welcome, it appears that most AfD contributors believe this article is failing PROMO and I have to agree that there is hardly anything to merge here, accordingly I have not changed my !vote and it is still at delete. I have added a line at Art_of_Living_Foundation and I guess that is all that is needed -- D Big X ray ᗙ  21:01, 28 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Looks a case of WP:NOTPROMO. Fails NCORP. Accesscrawl (talk) 08:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NCORP. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. GSS (talk |c|em ) 07:58, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete no WP:SIGCOV as most sources are routine announcements. As stated above notability is not inherited.  JC7V (talk) 20:12, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination, as subject fails WP:NCORP. -The Gnome (talk) 11:53, 29 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.