Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Vishnu Teertharu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 03:54, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Sri Vishnu Teertharu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A Hindu religious figure with a hagiography, not an encyclopedia article. I get no book hits, and while I found a fair number of other hits they all appear to be forums, blogs, and photo sites. Mangoe (talk) 13:29, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Mangoe (talk) 11:51, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mangoe (talk) 11:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:05, 16 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge or Redirect to Vishnu Tirtha . They appear to be the same person— have the same date of birth (1756–1806), alias and sect. On a cursory glance, nothing in this article appears to be worth salvaging. The other article cites just two questionable sources. I'll see what I can do with that one. Correct Knowledge  «৳alk»  20:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I stand corrected, there are two different Vishnu Tirthas. This website points out that the 18th century Vishnu Tirtha is different from the earlier (probably 14th century) one. That makes Hinduism: An Alphabetical Guide by Roshan Dalal the only reliable source for this article. The coverage of Vishnu Tirtha in this reference is not significant, so the article fails WP:GNG. Correct Knowledge  «৳alk»  21:13, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.