Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sridhar Teegala


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 21:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Sridhar Teegala

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. Contested WP:PROD. Contested by user who started article: "If any person (even the author him/herself) objects to the deletion (usually by removing the  tag), the proposal is aborted and may not be re-proposed." Shirt58 (talk) 08:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can find nothing but social networking sites and blogs - linkedin, facebook, twitter, hi5 etc. Also can't find anything on the films he is supposed to have directed -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's nothing out there to show this person has notability. For the record, this is one of many articles added by a single purpose editor trying to promote his film company.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Delete. Per the two users above, and also just to annoy the bloody spammer who created such havoc. Darkness Shines (talk) 09:03, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. I already proposed this article for deletion per WP:BLPPROD but it was removed (by the author) and (edit→ added later by another fellow editor). This article provides no links for reference/verification. I don't find any relevant results at Google either. Other articles like Dead Morning, Sameena Kausar, Sara Entertainment Pvt Ltd and Gayathri (2013 film) are also created by User:Wasirg (original author) which are either unsourced BLP, link to Facebook or don't have any references at all. I'm fed up with all these articles. Most of them have been nominated for AfD or proposed for Deletion. Considering the lack of reference, all of them could be a collection of hoaxes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trunks ishida (talk • contribs) 12:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The PROD was reinstated and is there too - it might be deleted that way first -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The only thing I'm worried about as far as the PROD goes is that the author can still potentially re-add it with a "source" akin to the facebook pages he's been trying to use thus far, which might result in having to go through AfD again.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 18:42, 3 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Once the page is deleted through this discussion, CSD G4 would be applicable if the content of article is similar (no substantial change) to the deleted one. If PROD tag is deleted by the author, or a source (Facebook, as usual) is added to the article, I don't think we have any choice. We'll have to go through AfD. However, We can try group nomination if there are multiple articles. trunks_ishida (talk) 21:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.