Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srija (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Merge/Redirect to Chiranjeevi. Action completed.  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 01:19, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Srija
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This biography is a one-event article and hence I felt this is of no encyclopedic value. I took it to AfD and here is its discussion. My concerns (as you might see from its talk page) were and still are the following: Based on my understanding, I don't see the existence of this article on its own. Since it is notable for one event and verifiable, I suggested a merge with Chiranjeevi's page. But the contending editor doesn't seem to budge from his stand of google hits and a bunch of Chiranjeevi fanatics supporting his cause. Mspraveen (talk) 06:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC) The article has independent and neutral sources. She is a household name in Andhra Pradesh is not limited to her marriage ,court case or a movie which being planned and her being chiranjeevee's daughter.There is Significant coverage from Reliable sources and Independent of the subject about her She is became celebraty in own right and she continues to hog the limelight.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Srija is known only for one event
 * The contending editor claims 200000 Google hits, whereas my contention was that he had a very poor argument because it was a non-valid general criteria as per WP:BIO and also that the article cannot assume inheritance from her father-actor-budding politician, Chiranjeevi.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   —Mspraveen (talk) 06:58, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: even 200000 links does not help in writing 20 sentences on her. That's because all of them deals with the same event. Other than her marriage, which was the single event that brought her into news, there is no other notable event/work involving her. However, the event should get mentioned in Chiranjeevi page, if not added already. --GDibyendu (talk) 07:38, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with Chiranjivi. Subject has no inherent notability. Notabilit comes frombeing Chiranjeevi's daughter. --Deepak D'Souza 09:11, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Srija clearly passes WP:BIO and WP:N. A search in google draws more than 200000 hits.Enough for a person to establish notabality for an article.The article clearly passes WP:BIO and WP:N..Enough for a person to establish notablity for an article and further WP:GNG.
 * Comment: Can you tell us under which criteria in WP:BIO this subject is notable? I could not find any. Rather it seems to fit WP:ONEVENT Also take a look at this:WP:BIO.--Deepak D'Souza 12:21, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject.of WP:BIO and further clearly meets WP:GNG There is Significant coverage from Reliable sources and Independent of the subject.There are 159000 hits in google about her.and over 200000 The fact that the marriage was a major event and she happens to be Chiranjeevi's daughter alone does not make the subject one event or inherited.There is significant coverage both in Indian and International Press about her. I will rewrite and improve the article in due course if it survives this AFD. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as the nominator. The above reasons cited by Pharaoh of the Wizards do not conform the the requirements for a biography article. Mspraveen (talk) 12:35, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Srija meets the basic criteria Basic criteria
 * Comment. Your comment seems to convey that the marriage (and obviously events surrounding it) was a major event. Kindly refer the WP:Bio guidelines for articles about people notable only for one event. Reliability or notability are not considered here because it carries undue weight. Can you assert independent notability of the subject? What if she was not Chiranjeevi's daughter? Will you warrant some 19-year old's elopement as an encyclopedic entry? Mspraveen (talk) 13:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. There's nothing in the article to suggest the events connected to this individual are notable enough to make a viable article. IF the planned movie is made, then that might change things. In the meantime, I just don't see the viability. If this article is kept, it needs to be rewritten from scratch. It's quite poorly written as it stands now (however, this is not a factor in my opinion). 23skidoo (talk) 16:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge. This incident of Srija and her small bio can be included in the article on Chiranjivi. -- Borfee (talk) 05:50, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merged and summarized the relevant and key portions from Srija to Chiranjeevi. See this diff for details. Mspraveen (talk) 08:27, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.