Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srijanshil Arajakta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The repair-work of User:Innisfree987 seems to have turned the consensus to KEEP. Joyous! | Talk 15:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Srijanshil Arajakta

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Source searches have provided zero coverage in reliable sources; fails WP:N. North America1000 01:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TNT. It is unclear what this even is. Bearian (talk) 17:04, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment These three pages probably contain some links that would help explain:
 * Upendra Subba
 * Hangyug Agyat
 * Rajan Mukarung
 * Would require a willing and language-capable editor though. Innisfree987 (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cerebellum (talk) 17:39, 23 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. That isn't an article, it's a 2-sentence opinion piece. It's short enough that there is no loss in deleting it and starting over. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Pinging, and  who have contributed to related articles, in case they are around and can help clarify. Thanks. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:01, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Found an English-language source--Kathmandu Post--that describes the movement clearly: http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/printedition/news/2013-08-16/homeland.html. I've added it, and revised for neutrality, so though a very brief stub, I think we're much more like to get an editor with the relevant language skills to expand it if the stub is open rather than deleted. I've also added categories, WikiProjects and a relevant stub tag to encourage attention to the entry. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:30, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as Innisfree987 handled some of the issues. This article now only needs expansion, as it has been proven that the movement actually exists. Ceosad (talk) 23:40, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  15:17, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Innisfree987 has now provided enough to presume it at least squeaks past WP:GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.