Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srinisha Jayaseelan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Only one keep !vote actually discusses the validity of the available sources. No reasons to delete beyond the original nomination have been offered despite 2 relists. (non-admin closure) Bungle (talk • contribs) 17:37, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Srinisha Jayaseelan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability is not inherited through available references. fails WP:GNG, WP:NSINGER GermanKity (talk) 14:36, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 14:36, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 14:36, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 14:36, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep: Enough notability clearly passes GNG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.196.157.195 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment Keep vote by ip address. suspected COI. GermanKity (talk)

Keep: Meets WP:NMUSIC no. 1 (due to articles in Times of India) and no. 10 ("Has performed music for a work of media that is notable" - for a number of notable films). Furius (talk) 14:32, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * comment Reference no. 1 is just a passing mention that is about the super singing competition. And there is nothing like Reference no. 10. However the all references fall under WP:NOTNEWS. GermanKity (talk) 02:05, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:57, 23 June 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. There is sufficient coverage of sources. Rondolinda (talk) 18:55, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 13:28, 5 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.