Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srinivasan Keshav


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Tone 19:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Srinivasan Keshav

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I do not believe this person passes either the author notability test for writing a book or professor notability test for academic pursuits. Miami33139 (talk) 22:40, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Gscholar shows papers with citation counts of 2759, 858, 780, 398, 376, 350, 341, 249. h-index is 28. Easily meets #1 of WP:PROF.--Sodabottle (talk) 17:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:PROF. Hobit (talk) 18:58, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Quite misguided nomination. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC).
 * Keep. Not that we need more reasons, but the Canada Research Chair is a pass of WP:PROF. And testifying to the U.S. Senate about the cost of wireless messaging services and then being quoted extensively in the NY Times and the Hindu about it also indicates a certain level of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:40, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Citability alone is already sufficient for passing WP:PROF. Also, as D.E. notes, holding a Canada Research Chair is enough to pass of WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 11:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.