Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St.Joseph's Indian Composite PU College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Already deleted by, after author nominated it for G7. Drmies (talk) 22:28, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

St.Joseph's Indian Composite PU College

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

plain advertising and partly copyvio] The Banner talk 18:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)


 * There's no question of advertising. The article just provides an insight of what is being done in the college. COPY??? A college can offer only what courses they offer. Hence,it is same as mentioned in the college's official website! Nothing shocking.When article about college is present in Wikipedia,many people get to know clearly about the college.User:Rohith.ravichandran.1
 * That's not how it works, User:Rohith.ravichandran.1; see WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines for our guidelines. First of all, yes it is promotional in tone and content, to the point where speedy deletion might be warranted. On the other hand, if the list of classes is the extent of the copyvio, that's not so bad, and if this is a "college" (it's so poorly written that it's hard to figure out what it is) it's probably automatically notable. Banner, I'll prune it some. That doesn't alleviate the lack of secondary sourcing, of course. Drmies (talk) 19:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Predictable: he reverted your edit. Just as he did with my efforts. The Banner talk 19:55, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Efforts of creating a whole new page is much tedious than removing!!!haha.... RohithRavichandran (talk) 20:24, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, , or (they run Wikiproject Schools) can put their grog and smoked turkey leg down for long enough to have a look at the newly-sanitized article and help bring it up to snuff. I believe that these three editors would benefit from a dive into the pool of Jesuit education. Semper ubi sub ubi, Drmies (talk) 19:14, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * To be frank, after your suggestion,I realized that the article was in a promotional tone. I have tried to resolve it. Visit the page and let me know if any more necessary changes have to be made. Its better to discuss the improvements rather than performing it on the page directly.RohithRavichandran (talk) 20:22, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Ehm, no. Not really. The version of Drmies, reverted by you, was much better. Your version still has the copyvio-part and a lot of completely irrelevant information and completely lacks independent sources (and even the present links to the school website are no links to the information that should be covered by the source) The Banner talk 20:27, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Abiding by the version of Drmies,merely makes the page just a book with 'Preface' page.Copyvio-part is retained because here,in the state of Karnataka of India, there are lot of courses and subjects offered by each and every Pre-university. It nearly ranges to 11 languages and 55 subjects. Hence, that particular portion had to be retained for sure to ensure this institute's standout difference from the other. You can cross-verify with other colleges' articles in the same province. I'll look into the sources and clean it up. RohithRavichandran (talk) 20:52, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * So? We are not here to promote a subject. We are here to give a neutral description of a subject, without fancy or nice stuff. Just the bare facts with a few pictures to support the text. The Banner talk 21:17, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Also,thanks for not edit warring and fulfilling my humble request. RohithRavichandran (talk) 20:54, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I believe the one edit warring is you. You've been warned already for that, and I added a "promotional" warning to it. Plus, I reverted you. Believe me, The Banner and I have looked at dozens if not hundreds of those articles, and we have a pretty good idea of what the guidelines allow. Revert again and I have no doubt you will be blocked. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:19, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Christ University RohithRavichandran (talk) 21:34, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.