Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Agnes Hospital (fiction)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. merge isnt an option for unsourced material so the valid policy based votes are for deletion Spartaz Humbug! 04:40, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

St. Agnes Hospital (fiction)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete this fictional location that fails the WP:GNG with a lack of multiple, independent WP:RS. WossOccurring (talk) 23:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 00:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: The nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Dalejenkins. Fences  &amp;  Windows  00:24, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The "set" for a "reality show" is completely unnotable; I don't even remember this show three years after its last episode. I'm surprised this one exists and would not ask for redirection because of it's lack of notability.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:40, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Apparently this location was used in only one episode of a reality television series. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Fairfield State Hospital which has been used as a location for several other productions of various sorts but which does not mention this case. Colonel Warden (talk) 09:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge into MTV's Fear. A stubby article about a not independently notable set. Mangoe (talk) 17:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to MTV's Fear. So far, this has too little distinct info to be worthy of a separate article. Since it is possible sources can be found, it is worth retaining the edit history, and it can be unmerged if more info and sources are found. Sebwite (talk) 18:18, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is so sub-notable it doesn't even warrant a redirect.  JBsupreme (talk) 21:05, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Completely un-noteworthy. Yaron K. (talk) 03:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * To say "completely" unnoteworthy is a little to strong in this case (see WP:Just not notable). This does pertain to a very notable subject. Therefore, I do believe a redirect (retaining edit history) is a fair compromise. Sebwite (talk) 06:26, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't agree with that logic - an article about a piece of gum chewed by Pope John Paul II also "pertains" to a very notable subject, but it's still completely un-noteworthy in itself. Yaron K. (talk) 15:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * This is not a redirect for now, but under #5 of WP:R, a redirect is kept if someone finds it useful, even if that is not yourself. This is not a redirect for now, but I am proposing it be such. Sebwite (talk) 22:31, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you actually know of someone for whom this redirect would be useful in helping to find the article for MTV's Fear, or are you just speculating? Yaron K. (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:14, 5 January 2010 (UTC).


 * Merge to Fairfield State Hospital. Warrah (talk) 01:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.