Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Aloysius Higher Secondary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete. Opinions are in equipoise (though the "procedural keep" vote is given no weight as to the merits of the article); there is no consensus, and no reason to expect that another relisting would yield such a result. BD2412 T 03:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

St. Aloysius Higher Secondary School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NSCHOOL. No Reliable Sources found with a WP:BEFORE.  Yogesh Warah Talk 05:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  Yogesh Warah Talk 05:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  Yogesh Warah Talk 05:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Yogesh Warah Talk 05:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions.  Yogesh Warah Talk 05:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, a search brought up only primary sources. Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:31, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Based on traditional measures, this would fail. However, according to User:Bearian/Standards, this is a notable school due to its age (over 100 years), size (4,000 students), and notable alumni. Bearian (talk) 17:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Bilorv ( talk ) 23:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep - bad faith nomination; created by a sock in evasion of their block Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Since another editor has suggested delete, this isn't a case of WP:CSK#4. — MarkH21talk 00:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete bold claims like "one of the oldest" need to be well sourced. This article is just not well sourced. Wikipedia has perpetrated too many hoaxes with such poor sourcing, such as the false claim about who invented hand sanitizer. We need to hold articles that make such claims to strong notability standards so we stop perpetuating hoaxes.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note I added some sources, while I wouldn't assert that these are sufficient for a WP:NSCHOOL pass, I think it likely that such sources exist.<strong style="color:#555555">Pontificalibus 15:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the additional sources added to the article so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.