Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Anne Parish, New Bedford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. KTC (talk) 09:48, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

St. Anne Parish, New Bedford

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No apparent notability and does not meet WP:ORG and WP:ORGDEPTH. Individual branches or chapters of larger organizations are not inherently notable. Mkdw talk 23:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC) Mkdw talk 23:03, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * It is no more or less notable than several other pages for closed churches in the Diocese of Fall River, Massachusetts or Catholic dioceses across the world. Others have their own pages as well. All concerned churches still exist as parts of existing parishes.EmperorOfLancs (talk) 23:10, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:OTHERCRAP. It should be noted that most of the above mentioned articles were created by either yourself and another wikipedia editor in a series. Using one recently created page to assert another should exist isn't a basis for notability. As outlined in the local units section of WP:ORG, an individual chapter or branch must show notability beyond its local area. Mkdw talk 23:14, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Find me solid coverage about this church, and I'll happily change my mind, but in the complete absence of time-independent sources, we can't have a reasonable article that follows our not-a-newspaper standards.  Nyttend (talk) 02:19, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.