Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Anne Seattle

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 22:31, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

St. Anne Seattle
Another school. Delete. P Ingerson 00:50, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; zero content, just stats and generic fluff. Could also be speedied since the author blanked it. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 00:54, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. notability. Mikkalai 01:44, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. &mdash; Sesel wa  05:48, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, school vanity. Dave the Red 07:18, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no verifiability - David Gerard 10:00, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * What's not verifiable about it? --BaronLarf 02:04, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete as vanity. Radiant_* 13:11, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity, fluff. Jayjg (talk) 01:57, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep This article is now hunky dory. However all schools and public institutions are notable and encyclopedic.Klonimus 03:00, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * What are the provisions of the "provisional" keep? If the article remains unimproved, how long should it remain in limbo before it can be deleted as abandoned? --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 04:30, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 02:39, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and continue to expand. --BaronLarf 02:40, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. School vanity. Not notable, so no possibility to become encyclopedic. Jonathunder 03:09, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's a private elementary school with some slightly unusual arrangements.  Not notable. --Carnildo 03:39, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Take away the name of the place and what are you left with? Right.  Empty, unencyclopedic article.  Delete for questionable notability and lack of content.  Why do half-baked articles always seem to involve a school?  Discuss.  :^) - Lucky 6.9 04:19, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonencyclopedic vanity --Angr/(comhrá) 08:56, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - As with all Schools, I vote to keep. --Irishpunktom\talk 11:39, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow for organic growth. bbx 16:33, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - As with all Schools, I vote to delete. --Bucephalus 17:23, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * keep please Yuckfoo 01:33, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. As with apparently non-notable schools lacking pithy or interesting article content and likely to remain unimproved in future, I vote to delete. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 20:58, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wikipedia is not paper.  As long as Spinarak exists, this should also exist. -- brian0918    02:16, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. All the usual reasons apply.--Gene_poole 02:25, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. All the usual reasons apply. Say, Gene, where's your friend "Centauri"? You'd think he'd be here with bells on, to vote. --Calton | Talk 04:16, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable.  Noisy | Talk 10:38, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability not established. Indrian 14:44, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, absolutely useless. Grue 16:28, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable, essentially vanity. --InShaneee 16:31, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, perfectly notable. Dan100 20:32, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Schools are noteworthy. --Zantastik 07:01, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. very notable. NRS11 3:50, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * User has only two edits, both to this page. Indrian 04:03, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Useless collection of generic facts about an insignificant school. This is not an encyclopedia article. Gamaliel 14:14, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. Wikipedia is not paper. However, put a Wikify tag on the page if it's kept. --Kieran 09:05, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. -- Lochaber 14:00, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This school is not notable. "Organic growth" seems unlikely &mdash; even with more verbiage on the screen, the school will still be not notable. -- Dcfleck 03:37, 2005 Apr 15 (UTC)*Keep this school article. Notability is subjective. This should probably be moved to a better title, though.   ~leif &#9786; HELO 19:05, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Note To admins, this article has undergone substantial revisions during the VFD Process. Please evaluate the current article on it's merits, it may need to be resubmitted to VfD, since some people would change thier votes (Towards keep) if they saw it now. Klonimus 03:00, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Some might, but I would certainly not. Still nothing particularly noteworthy.  Many schools have community service requirements, sports teams, eighth grade graduations and all the other stuff you have included.  I do appreciate the effort you have put into this article, as most of the time these articles remain unchanged throughout the VfD process.  If you could just give it something that makes it stand out from the crowd, I would be happy to change my vote. Indrian 03:28, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, now a quality, informative article. Kappa 03:24, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Even this rewrite fails to establish any notablity whatsoever. The JPS 10:54, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I voted above. My vote is still delete, and for the same reason - zero encyclopedic content, just stats and generic fluff. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 12:41, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.