Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Austin Catholic School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep (14 keep, 7 delete).  Rob e  rt  T 01:35, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

St. Austin Catholic School
Advert for a NN school. Fallsend 02:40, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - Please come contribute to ongoing discussion at WP:SCH. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 00:37, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per Nom. Fallsend 02:40, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Withdraw Delete Vote Per rewrite of article. Still not notable, but quite a bit more fitting. Fallsend 07:51, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertising. Dpbsmith (talk) 02:57, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Schools/Arguments. The article has been completely rewritten.  Silensor 06:14, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Some academic achievements noted (not sure if top 10 on Stanford 10 list is a geat achievement though). Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:51, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * They were among the top 10, not on number 10. But I still have no idea what a Stanford list is and how prestigious being awarded a Blue Ribbon is. Can someone enlighten me? - Mgm|(talk) 12:11, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * More prestigious than being awarded a Schlitz, not as prestigious as being awarded a Michelob. Actually Kappa has now linked it to Blue Ribbon Schools Program, which "has recognized more than 3,000 schools since its inception." Dpbsmith (talk) 18:14, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satisfies my criterion of being more notable than Koga (Pokémon). &mdash; BRIAN 0918 &bull; 2005-11-10 14:27
 * Comment sounds like a good arguement to AfD Koga (Pokémon)...--Isotope23 17:32, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Or merge it into a list, which is something that has been quietly happening with many of the Pokémon character stubs lately. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 00:37, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep all schools. Hipocrite - &laquo; Talk &raquo; 14:46, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all schools below the high-school level. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 18:11, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no evidence of encyclopedic significance has been presented other than being a school, which is sufficient for some but not for me. Dpbsmith (talk) 18:14, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I think a national ranking in Stanford 10 Achievement Test could make them borderline notable. I'll pass on this one as undecided. &mdash; RJH 18:36, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * keep this please it is a prestigious and notable school Yuckfoo 19:04, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * WEAK Keep, if only because there is no better entity to merge this into and per the developing consensus at WP:SCH.Gateman1997 19:19, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable and someone buy Mgm a Pabst.--Isotope23 21:04, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I place the burden of proof for notability on the school below the high school level. Academic excellence seems to merit it, although its awards need editorial clarification. Durova 21:57, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep on keeping schools. Christopher Parham (talk) 22:05, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Even primary schools are more notable than plenty of things that are kept with less controversy. CalJW 23:35, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * And far less notable than plenty of things that are deleted with little controversy. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:02, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn school. Dottore So 23:52, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Edwardian 00:32, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - Please contribute to ongoing discussion at WP:SCH and help end this fractitious debate. D e nni &#9775; 03:11, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, the school appears to make some claim to notability by being a Blue Ribbon school. Yamaguchi先生 08:08, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, the awards don't appear to be really impressive, but being in the top 10 of the Stanford 10 looks like a notable enough achievement. - Mgm|(talk) 10:16, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn school --JAranda &#124; watz sup 05:38, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep notable school. Klonimus 08:37, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Setting aside for a moment whether a school needs to be particularly notable to be encyclopedic, do you feel that this is a particularly notable school, or that all schools are encyclopedic subjects? - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 08:58, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Does it matter? I simply do not understand the crusade by "those who routinely nominate and/or vote to delete school articles" to ferret out whether or not someone feels that a particular school is relatively more important than others or whether the very fact that something is a school endows it with noteworthiness. I am baffled by this because I can't figure out, how in the context of the way Wikipedia works, why it matters. If someone holds the opinion that a school is notable, what bloody difference does it make what his particular subjective criteria are?--Nicodemus75 09:08, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Because I was curious as to his motivation, whether it was merely existence or instead some standard this particular school met. Last I checked, this was supposed to be a discussion, after all. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 10:06, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Schools/Arguments --Vsion 09:15, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as part of the fight [personal attack removed]. The mere fact of something's existence makes it worthy of an article.  Kurt Weber 23:43, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks verfiability other than own website... -- red stucco 09:27, 14 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.