Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Brendan's LGBT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Merge to St. Brendan's Sixth Form College. While this AFD, per clear consensus, is closed as a merge, I have made the (completely reversible) editorial decision that the content already there is all that is needed, effectively making this a redirect. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  12:15, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

St. Brendan&

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable student group. The article makes claims that are not confirmed via Google searching, creating WP:RS problems. Joal Beal (talk) 02:03, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Added references to article, it is a leading and ground breaking society in Further Education liberation, if that is 'Non-notable', delete half the wiki... - Abedecian  ~  Talk to me  and you get cake! 02:46, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:Notability is a jargon term as used on Wikipedia, with a meaning not identical to the usual one. Lady  of  Shalott  00:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge into the main St Brendan's article. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:35, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge As above. Tb hotch Ta lk C.  03:11, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge into school article, and remove claims of being the first LGBT group in a Roman Catholic school. ...  disco spinster   talk  03:42, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge or delete. Fails WP:CLUB. On a sidenote those unsourced assertions are huge, it's only a year old, GU has had one since 1988. --Savonneux (talk) 07:20, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Note to administrators: I'd like to request that this article be given a few days grace while the creator works on finding sources from local media outlets to show notability. Just no snowing, please? -mattbuck (Talk) 03:51, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge. Even if sources are found, it belongs in the main school article as perhaps three sentences. tedder (talk) 15:57, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  —  Lady  of  Shalott  00:12, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge into the main school article, where most (all?) of it already is anyway. Lady  of  Shalott  00:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, do not merge per WP:N and WP:RS concerns. There is already so much info on this group in the school's article that it creates significant undue weight problems there.  No need to exacerbate those issues by inserting additional material in a merge.  Heather (talk) 22:11, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -  Abedecian  ~  Talk to me  and you get cake! 17:27, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.