Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Catharines Collegiate Secondary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 13:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

St. Catharines Collegiate Secondary School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I'm the article creator. I could G7, but I don't think it's warranted in this case. I made a mistake by creating an article before I was entirely certain of its notability.

The most significant coverage I could find was a few pages from a journal and a few paragraphs in a book. There's more details on the talk page. I've thoroughly searched Google and Google Books, but the most coverage I could find was relatively trivial. It's possible that someone else has access to sources that I don't have that could prove notability. Clover moss (talk) 22:19, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Clover moss  (talk) 22:19, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  Clover moss  (talk) 22:19, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:47, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Plenty of sourcing around to satisfy WP:GNG, as with any other secondary school in a western country. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:07, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete All the references in the article except for one are primary and the only other thing I could find was a WP:MILL article about some students from the school preforming at a festival. Maybe there's some local trivial newspaper coverage about them out there, but if so I couldn't find any and it probably wouldn't be enough to make this notable anyway. I'm more then willing to change my vote to keep if Necrothesp or anyone else can provide WP:THREE in-depth, non-newsy secondary references though. It should be pretty easy to do if there's really plenty of sources around about it like Necrothesp is claiming there are. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:09, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  03:10, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per source analysis by Adamant1. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 03:14, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete As secondary schools don't automatically pass notability and there is not enough significant coverage.Jackattack1597 (talk) 10:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.