Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Colman's College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep Jtkiefer  T - 18:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

St. Colman's College
The text contained within this article previous version is untrue. Contained in the article is picture of the College which does not have its consent given by the owners. St. Colman's College would like to have no association with this article due to its underminding content and wish for it to be removed as soon as possible — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.19.76.69 (talk • contribs) 15:36


 * Keep. Verifiable school with 100+ year history. This nomination is bizarre, an institution's wish to be included in WP or not should have no bearing whatsoever on an article. The image may need to be removed for copyvio.--Nicodemus75 20:56, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, this school appears to be of sufficent status to be included.Gateman1997 21:25, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, all established schools are of sufficient status to be included. I'm sorry if the article has been vandalized, I'll try to keep an eye on it. If the vandalism gets bad enough, you can ask for it to be protected. (kappa) 21:30, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Your opinion on sufficency of status is noted and disagreed with.Gateman1997 21:33, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Your opinion on sufficency of status is noted and disagreed with.--Nicodemus75 22:53, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the old schools, which tend to have the greatest potential for making an interesting read --rob 21:50, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Nicodemus75 and expand. (note: I have moved the unsourced closure rumor which may have prompted the AfD to Talk:St. Colman's College, requesting a source.) --Kgf0 21:54, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * keep this please the school is over 100 years old even Yuckfoo 22:33, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep this historical school as per Schools/Arguments. Silensor 07:38, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Great college current data not correct and history pages are a disgrace.88.109.55.163 23:36, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Vote discounted by closing admin. Jtkiefer  T - 18:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

DeleteThis college is excellent,well managed and very successful. Please delete this page as it is not correct in detail and all the pages in the history file as they have been vandalized and contain very SERIOUS text.88.109.40.181 08:29, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Vote discounted by closing admin. Jtkiefer  T - 18:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

DeleteAdministrators please note this college is excellent and is important to all the pupils and everyone associated with it. Please respect this college's reputation by removing this page and all the pages in the history file back to Sept.7th 2005. Please protect the article from vandalism  in the future.88.110.194.47 12:26, 14 October 2005 (UTC).
 * Vote discounted by closing admin. Jtkiefer  T - 18:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

DeleteJust discovered this article and I ask you to delete it as soon as possible and I agree with previous request thast all should be deleted to Sept 7th.2005 article as some of the text is disgusting and very derogatory. Please protect the article in future from such wilful vandalism. thank you.88.110.32.149 14:29, 14 October 2005 (UTC).
 * Vote discounted by closing admin. Jtkiefer  T - 18:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

DeleteAdministrators please delete this article as soon as possible at least back to the Sept.7th 2005 entry. The articles from that date contain inaccurate, sad, evil, potentially libellous text.These enteries are just an attempt to use this source to discredit a pupil-focused, well managed college 88.110.193.191 09:23, 15 October 2005 (UTC).
 * Vote discounted by closing admin. Jtkiefer  T - 18:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

DeleteThe content of this article is sad and a terrible mis -representation of the truth. Please delete and ensure that such rubbish is never allowed to be put into print on your pages in future as it just discredits your publication. thank you in anticipation of you removing all articles at least back to Sept.7th.2005.88.110.19.228 18:06, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Vote discounted by closing admin. Jtkiefer  T - 18:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.