Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. David School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Doc ask?  18:19, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

St. David School
What makes this school notable? Unlike other Diocese of Oakland schools with articles in Wikipedia there are no mentions of notable faculty, alumni, athletics or academics. Dspserpico 23:50, 15 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment: Contributor also disputed prod. Dspserpico 23:52, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - All schools are notable. Chairman S.  Talk  00:13, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment If the consensus for this article is "keep" then this article would need a serious amount of cleanup and wikifying. However I really do think this school lacks notability.  It's a elementary school with no notable faculty or alumni.  Most schools that are notable are usually high schools and universities.  I highly doubt people outside of Richmond, California has heard of St. David's.  I don't think people outside of my hometown would know anything about my elementary school. Dspserpico 00:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If kept much of the information needs to be deleted and the article needs a major cleanup. Vegaswikian 19:56, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete See my comments above Dspserpico 20:32, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge If the info needs deletion, then it can be merged to its district.  JeffBurdges 20:39, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Can't merge, it's a Catholic School and there is no article about the schools of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Oakland. Dspserpico 21:17, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * My overriding feeling is that this title should not have an article. Slight merge and redirect to Roman Catholic Diocese of Oakland, otherwise delete. This is not a keep vote. Stifle (talk) 22:55, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This article is too long to merge adequately, and precedent on schools is clear. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:20, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow for continued organic growth, not a valid merge candidate. Bahn Mi 17:31, 21 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.