Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Davids Christian Writers' Conference


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Notability not established or demonstrated. postdlf (talk) 03:06, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

St. Davids Christian Writers' Conference

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No demonstration of notability in cited references. No in depth coverage from third party sources offered. Warfieldian (talk) 18:54, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete References at the article are self-referential. Google News finds only passing mentions. (BTW if the article is kept, the title needs to have its punctuation corrected. It should be St. David's Christian Writers Conference. Somehow the apostrophe migrated from "David" to "writers" in this article title.) --MelanieN (talk) 20:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The organization itself puts the apostrophe after writers' not after David, and they're writers.I.Casaubon (talk) 19:06, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, the items at Google News (written by REAL writers) mostly put it as I suggested. The fact that they style it this way leaves me even more convinced that the article should be deleted. What kind of writers can they be, if they can't punctuate their own name properly? 0;-D --MelanieN (talk) 23:50, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The apostrophe after Writers is correct, if the conference belongs to the writers that is. The missing one after David is another issue. Borock (talk) 03:26, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep it gets a lot of hits on google books, and appears to be "real" in the sense that it is a sizeable writer's conference that has been meeting annually for half a century, some authors give it a hat tip (I sold my first book via a contact I made at St. Davids), and draws a substantial crowd.I.Casaubon (talk) 19:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The article as it stands is very amateurish. it could use a writer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by I.Casaubon (talk • contribs) 19:01, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:06, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep The topic seems to be notable enough, even though the article needs to be improved. But even as it is a reader learns something. Borock (talk) 03:23, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Article does not meet general notability criteria--יום יפה (talk) 14:45, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete due to insufficient verifiable third-party references. Stifle (talk) 09:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.