Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Francis Xavier Montmorency


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. BigDom  talk  08:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

St. Francis Xavier Montmorency

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article fails to make a case against WP:ORG and primary schools are not automatically notable (per WP:OUTCOMES). PROD rapidly deleted without explanation, so raising for wider discussion (the article may also be a copyvio of http://www.sfxmontmorency.catholic.edu.au/ which I only noticed after raising this AFD). Fæ (talk) 11:34, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 11:35, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability in Wikipedia terms. I think the author may have genuinely misunderstood the purpose of Wikipedia, which is not intended to duplicate or substitute for a school or parish website, whether or not copyright considerations apply. AJHingston (talk) 13:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sign of interest from reliable sources. Take away the copyvio from the school's "Our School" page and there is nothing left worth saving. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete a primary school is only notable if it meets WP:ORG. This does not. Simply copy and pasting does not make an article. LibStar (talk) 06:24, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Montmorency, Victoria. This is a local primary school, with an article derived from its own website, and a perspective so provincial that the website doesn't bother to tell where Montmorency is. I found no sources to suggest notability. --Orlady (talk) 04:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.