Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Church (Raleigh, North Carolina)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles (talk) 10:36, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Church (Raleigh, North Carolina)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable church, with no WP:V or WP:RS in the article, based on the common name, it will be extremely difficult to sort out GHits. Church is less than 30 years old. GregJackP  Boomer!   22:29, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  —  Lady  of  Shalott  22:35, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  —  Lady  of  Shalott  22:36, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence that this is anything other than a perfectly ordinary, non-notable parish church. (The article is also somewhat promotional.) JamesBWatson (talk) 12:00, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Tone of article pushes the limits of WP:PROMO. Only two Web sites provided as reference material, one of which is a self-reference for the subject. Without more reliable source material for support, the article fails WP:NOTE. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 12:18, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The article needs vast improvement, but is still within WP:PROMO. The subject is notable, if more reliable information could be added about the Church's School. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 00:07, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent sources in article, and none found by a quick search. Fails WP:GNG. -- Radagast 3 (talk) 23:11, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge a brief summary (with link to church website) to Raleigh, North Carolina, starting a new section "churches", with the school added (if necessary) to Education. This is usually the best solution for institutions only of local significance.  Peterkingiron (talk) 23:35, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.