Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Gabriel Church (Windsor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 10:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

St. Gabriel Church (Windsor)
non notable church in fabulous Windsor, Ontario Brianyoumans 03:06, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Very minor, non-notable church. Google shows only 95 relevant Google results.-- TBC Φ  talk?  03:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability.-- Hús  ö  nd  03:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. Imo  eng  07:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Per the article saying that it has a low enough attendance for the church to be closed, I personally do not see this as notable. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 11:23, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. I think the article says that a different church is being merged into this one, so this church is a going concern. Deet 03:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - No assertion of ntability. Very little information of use in the article.  Chris Kreider 19:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge the useful information into Windsor, Ontario. JYolkowski // talk 20:36, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete parishcruft. Carlossuarez46 03:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge the useful information into List of Windsor churches or similar. Rob Russell 16:07, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability. No use of sources of any type, much less ones meeting WP:INDY.  GRBerry 03:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete if it stays in current state. Arbusto 09:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I acknowledge that it's not that notable, and the article isn't filled out, but it's a real church. Do we need to reserve this name for another church in Windsor called St. Gabriel, and if not, what harm does it do? I am obviously more of an inclusionist and like the ability to find obscure topics in Wikipedia. Why not just label it as a stub? Deet 03:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * When I was a kid, I had a cat named "Penny", sadly now deceased. Penny was real, and is now obscure and non-notable - should he have a Wikipedia article too? I admit the church is much more notable than Penny, but lines do need to be drawn somewhere. --Brianyoumans 05:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.