Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Gregory the Great Parish


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Icestorm815 •  Talk  04:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

St. Gregory the Great Parish

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does every church get a WP page? No. Why is this one so special? gordonrox24 (talk) 22:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I hate to zap a church, but I can't see any notability here.HeartofaDog (talk) 00:17, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Not enough for me to say keep, but I think it's cool that they hold part of the remains of St. Gregory (540-604). Mandsford (talk) 02:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: Ya, I don't like tearing at the church, but for the sake of Wikipedia, it doesn't look like it belongs.--gordonrox24 (talk) 11:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, average churches aren't notable. Nyttend (talk) 12:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - it alleges notability that it holds relics. I'd like to see a citation for that. Bearian (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)  I couldn;t find that, but I did find some information online.  This seems to be one of the churches involved in scandals, which alone may confer notability. Bearian (talk) 00:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - More or less by definition, all Roman Catholic churches are supposed to hold relics of saints or such in the altar, so the holding of relics can't be a claim of notability unless we want all RC churches to have separate pages. There does seem to be one external source, but I don't think that one source qualifies the article for being kept. John Carter (talk) 13:58, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and tag for sources, as is as notable in its community as a high school, if not more so., , . And the delete arguments here act as an indicator that more such articles will be arriving. Let's pave the way.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per John Carter. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 00:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.