Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. James the Fisherman Episcopal Church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge. W.marsh 00:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

St. James the Fisherman Episcopal Church


disputed PROD for NN-local church delete DesertSky85451 01:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N, no more notable than any other church.-- TBC Φ  talk?  02:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Most individual churches are non-notable. --Metropolitan90 02:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * keep or merge to appropriate diocese or locality. Un  focused  03:21, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per TBC and nom. There is nothing to distinguish this church from any other church. JoshuaZ 05:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn church, nothing more. We should introduce the places of worship criteria sooner or later. --Ter e nce Ong (T 06:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge - to here or here. While the church is not notable enough for its own page, there is no reason to delete a decent article when it would greatly improve either of the two relevant pages I mention above. -bobby  14:59, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If merged, it should be with the article on the community. Articles for the dioceses of the Episcopal Church don't usually include mentions of the individual parishes of the dioceses. The cathedral parish is an exception; I can see an exception for a very notable parish, but this isn't one of those. -- Bpmullins | Talk 18:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn parish church, parishcruft. Carlossuarez46 19:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Islamorada, Florida (or to the diocese page as mentioned above). Doesn't need its own article but that doesn't mean that the information can't be useful elsewhere.  If anyone's interested in expanding the article, I'd be interested in knowing why it changed its name so often.  JYolkowski // talk 03:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as suggested, nn ~ BigrTex 02:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.