Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. John Bosco Interparish School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

St. John Bosco Interparish School

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article on non-notable school Arizona, has existed for almost a year without any significant information added. Has been proposed for speedy deletion twice as non-notable. Macboots 21:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless significantly expanded and sourced. If this is a primary or intermediate school, then some indication of notability is required as well.- gadfium 05:54, 30 September 2007 (UTC). Now neutral. The article has been expanded and sourced, but still doesn't adequately assert notability.- gadfium  04:12, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Question:Where might I find the policy for articles on primary or intermediate schools requiring notability, beyond their existence? If I don't see an answer here I'll hit up your talk page in a day or so. Gh5046 03:58, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * There have been numerous discussions on school notability, but I am not aware that any have reached consensus. You can find links to at least some of those discussions at WP:SCHOOL. I am using my own standards, not any policy, to guide my recommendations on whether schools should have articles.- gadfium 05:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * One possibility would be to merge it into the appropriate neighbourhood article. The article doesn't say which neighbourhood it is in though.- gadfium 08:14, 2 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, since it's been updated. Delete if not expanded.If it doesn't have useful information there's no reason for its existence. Gh5046 06:22, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No claim to notabilty whatsoever.--Victor falk 14:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete school with no claim of notabilty, no Reliable sources to boot. Jbeach56 21:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * While improved, still doesn't indicate notabilty, and the sources are very poor, either trivial mentions, local news, or very unreliable sources like great schools and flicker, still delete. Jbeach56 02:55, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, as it looks like sources exist. I'll do what I can with the article momentarily.  Best, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 00:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: That's much better, I've added an infobox and changed my vote to keep. Gh5046 02:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per Jbeach56. Finding enough sources to justify notability for primary or intermediate schools is difficult, and I don't think the burden has been met yet. The references so far are quite minor. Schools do not acquire notability by having a recycling program. EdJohnston 14:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't seem very notable to me. It also lacks the most elementary information, e.g. what level school it is, and how many attend. Richard001 04:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep the updated version.  ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 05:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.