Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. John International University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nom blocked, Thanks to everyone who's fixed his delightful edits!. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 16:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

St. John International University

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The information on our page continually is edited by a third party with incorrect information, which is hurtful to our organization. The text they are adding and altering are opinion based. This untrue information is negatively impacting the reputation of the university. We have attempted to contact the editors but they will not respond or stop. Due to this, this page must be deleted for good. ClintonElamSJIU (talk) 11:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy close This is an encyclopedia, not a private website. If you can not handle that then mothball your account, otherwise deal with it. TomStar81 (Talk) 11:24, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep/Speedy close I presume the nom is talking about the St. John International University, which was repeatedly blanked since January. This is a content issue over a clearly notable subject, and AfD is not the place to end a dispute like that. I must also note that the talk page of the article was never used to discuss the issue. As a reference, please read Wikipedia's guidelines on editing with a conflict of interest.  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 12:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy close to keep The nominator has already been blocked. I edited the article to lift out the worst puffery added by people at the "university", but to keep all the factual information (ie the very information the nominator wanted to delete).Jeppiz (talk) 13:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.