Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Joseph Medical Center (Tacoma, Washington)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  06:48, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

St. Joseph Medical Center (Tacoma, Washington)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article does not demonstrate notability. This is part of a group of articles created by a SPA on hospitals owned by CHI Franciscan Health. &#32;DocumentError (talk) 20:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 03:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 03:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 03:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. A major hospital in a major city, with plenty of coverage in The Seattle Times, a major newspaper. Please check for sources WP:BEFORE nominating.  Sounder Bruce  03:38, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep this is a long-established hospital, with scads of RS sourcing potential, and what it is right now is a stub. Jclemens (talk) 04:18, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * delete This was speedy-deletable as an advertisement. If somebody wants to try to write an actual WP article that would be great. This is disgusting industrial waste that been dumped into our beautiful project. "long standing" and "RS potential" are not valid deletion arguments but instead are hand-wavy, empty rhetoric.  Local BOOSTERism is also not a reason to keep. Jytdog (talk) 13:01, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * It's a hospital not a male performance enhancement drug. Think it's too promotional? Rewrite it. Jclemens (talk) 20:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per Sounder . There are plenty of sources, both about the quality (or lack thereof) of the hospital, significant changes and so on. It isn't blatant promo, and advertising is only cause for deletion when "without any relevant or encyclopedic content". There are sources to be gathered, and is fine to keep even as-is, though improvement is obviously possible. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:06, 25 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.