Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Joseph School of San Jose City


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 15:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

St. Joseph School of San Jose City

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete for non-notability. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 05:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SCHOOL. If a secondary school serves a majority of students in its region, it is generally considered notable. Ottre 05:36, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * How did you determine that it "serves a majority of students in its region"? According to the school's unreferenced article, it has a student body of 800.  San Jose City has a population of 108,254.  So what is the relevant region here?  Postdlf (talk) 00:26, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Geogre's law. Stifle (talk) 08:35, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: This has been moved to St. Joseph School of San Jose City with the redirect deleted. Stifle (talk) 12:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep It should be considered notable. If there were a school district representative of this school to which it could be merged, then that would be my recommendation.  It can and should be expanded with additional information, but does not deserve to be deleted.  Javier  MC  01:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Apart from whatever opinions we may have about the subject matter, there are no reliable sources at present. If information about it can't be documented outside of the school's own website (apparently a myspace page), then there isn't anything upon which an article can be based.  Postdlf (talk) 01:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —  Javier  MC  01:34, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - since it contains a high school. Filipino schools invariably have a poor internet presence. We need to avoid systemic bias and time should be given for local sources to be researched and added. TerriersFan (talk) 15:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Or we could delete based on the subject's current lack of verifiable information, without prejudice to recreation at such a time such reliable sources are found. Postdlf (talk) 19:35, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:50, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:CSB and the fact that high schools are inherently notable. --Pwnage8 (talk) 04:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep It has a secondary school, although it has a pretty small student population. Starczamora (talk) 20:46, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It actually has large student body, comparatively speaking. Ottre 02:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.