Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Katherine Greek Orthodox Church (Burlington, North Carolina)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No sources presented to establish notability. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:53, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

St. Katherine Greek Orthodox Church (Burlington, North Carolina)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Generic local congregation, no substantive third-party sources to establish notability Reywas92Talk 23:43, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 00:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 00:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete -- quite apart from copy-vio issues, this appears to be an unremarkable local church. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:49, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Halt/Wait - Someone needs to find more sources within a month or two of about this one of two only Eastern Orthodox Parish, as well need to be noble Primary or Secondary based I guess, before if they wanted to delete the page, with my approval. Chad The Goatman (talk) 19:33, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * User:Chad The Goatman Just so. Will you have a chance to look for some?E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:12, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh course, not right now as I mentioned with also given the reason of extending it until there no new sources. Chad The Goatman (talk) 21:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. I wrote this article a few years back and, admitting, did not do a great job. That being said, it is unique for a Greek Orthodox parish to exist in rural North Carolina and I feel that, with some help or time, I may be able to find more written sources to back a claim of significance. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:11, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * User:Willthacheerleader18, I've added two sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:54, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, my current location in its state standards, Is prefer as semi-urban and small city since its have current 52,000 to 54,000+ people living there. Chad The Goatman (talk) 21:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:52, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as reliable sources references are being added and commitments have been made for article improvement so deletion is unwarranted at this stage Atlantic306 (talk) 13:55, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:01, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, without prejudice to speedy recreation if additional sources are found which show independent, in-depth coverage in reliable sources, but I'm not seeing any here and don't see any when I look myself. It may be unusual for the area, but the fact of that doesn't manifest sources for us to use. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 14:06, 13 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.