Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Mary's Convent High School, Mulund


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mulund. Liz Read! Talk! 07:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

St. Mary's Convent High School, Mulund

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable school, only cites primary sources and a search finds nothing beyond the usual social media accounts and directory listings etc. Fails WP:GNG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India,  and Maharashtra. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Regretful delete or userfy to the editor's own space. I saw this on NPP and put some tags on and before it was expanded and was even tempted to PROD but didn't think that would last long. It seems the editor has made a genuine attempt to try and build an article and a few years ago, this wouldn't have been an issue, but per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES these days, assumed notability is no longer. I also have concerns around WP:COI and the vast prose here that is entirely uncited to any source. If the editor can find some reliable, WP:SECONDARY coverage that has some significance, then I may reconsider, otherwise it's just bordering on being promotional. Bungle (talk • contribs) 18:37, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mulund - WP:ATD. Ingratis (talk) 12:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure how this serves any useful purpose. The premise of WP:ATD-R would be that the new target has some relevance, at least. The page Mulund has a list of other educational institutions but doesn't actually have any prose about education itself in the region. Bungle (talk • contribs) 13:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)4
 * 1) What ATD-R says is this: "A page can be blanked and redirected if there is a suitable page to redirect to, and if the resulting redirect is not inappropriate." This article is about a school in Mulund - how is the article on Mulund, which as you were able to note contains a list of schools, not suitable as a redirect target? 2) particularly in the light of Template:R to list entry . 3) It's standard practice to redirect individual schools, if NN, to their respective school districts and this is comparable. Ingratis (talk) 16:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I hear your point, I just don't see the usefulness given the state of the respective target article (and in this example, your suggestion should have at least been to the school list section, rather than the bare article title)? I don't outright disagree with a redirect which is a form of deletion, I just don't see how the proposed target in this instance is useful. Usually, regional articles have some discussion about education on them. Bungle (talk • contribs) 20:03, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Don't think that's necessarily so, and in any case they don't need to - referring you back to ATD-R, and to my previous comment which gives three reasons pro redirect. Another one however is that a redirect preserves the text: since I seriously doubt that any BEFORE included offline sources or sources in Indian languages, this gives more time for any such to be discovered / included without the time pressure of draftifying. Yes, obviously the redirect would be to the list - I didn't think that needed to be spelled out. Ingratis (talk) 21:52, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to Mulund Manannan67 (talk) 20:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.