Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Michael's Catholic School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to West Memphis, Arkansas. There is a clear consensus, that a separate article for this school isn't warranted. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 20:07, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

St. Michael's Catholic School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

School through grade six. Appears to be non-notable; its claims to notability in the article seem to fall short of what we look for. Deletion of the unreferenced text (w/redirect to whatever makes sense would be fine, w/merge of the referenced sentence) appears to be in order. Epeefleche (talk) 20:21, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 21:49, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 21:49, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep The nomination is proposing merger not deletion so so should be closed speedily per WP:SK, "proposing a non-deletion action such as moving or merging". Warden (talk) 23:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The nomination is proposing deletion, while saying that merger of the 1 solitary referenced sentence would be fine.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:20, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Deletion and merger are incompatible. Please see WP:MAD which explains the legal constraint.  See also our deletion policy which advises against deletion nominations when there are sensible alternatives to deletion.  Warden (talk) 23:28, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * That essay (not a guideline -- just the view of one or more editors) doesn't require quite what you suggest it requires, as I read it. I don't, for example, see it as requiring a "speedy keep" here, as you suggest it does.  And, it is simply an essay.  The vast majority of this article is wholly unsourced.  One lone sentence has a source -- the essay describes how that sentence could be merged.  But, that is not a necessity -- I leave it up to the community.  Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:50, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The essay is a clarification of policy for those who don't get it. As it explains in the nutshell, it is an elaboration of Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License and Copying within Wikipedia. Warden (talk) 07:46, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, non-notable primary school. I oppose redirecting because this is a very generic name for a school which should not be used as a redirect to a specific place. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 23:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet WP:GNG or current school guidelines. Edinburgh  Wanderer  22:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect (blank, and merge any useful  content) per convention and per nominator's own suggestion. Non   notable schools are generally  not  deleted; instead,  as demonstrated by 100s of AfD closures, they are redirected to  the article about  the school district (USA) or to  the article about  the locality (rest  of the world). Note: Wikipedia has WP:DAB pages for articles that may have the same or similar names.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:14, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect/Merge to locality or school governing body per longstanding consensus. I'm also expressing concern with the large numbers of school nominations at the moment; it can't be expected that all editors be able to respond to this mass act of deletionist ideology. &tilde;danjel [ talk | contribs ] 00:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

NOTE for closer: if this AfD is closed as 'redirect', please remember to include the  on  the redirect  page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:14, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.