Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Michael High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. SynergeticMaggot 06:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

St. Michael High School
The content sounds like it was copied out of the school newsletter, but the grammar gets a "needs improvement". A large volume of unwikified matter, but it doesn't assert notability, doesn't cite sources, and contains mostly irrelevant unencyclopedic banalities. Opabinia regalis 05:16, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment possible copyvio, relisted as such. -- Koffieyahoo 05:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Copyvio is gone. What's left is a rather generic high school stub with a few references. All high schools are notable. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 16:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; Given the current, very minimal content, it doesn't meet my personal criteria for H.S. notability. Sorry. &mdash; RJH (talk) 16:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; Looks a little better now. &mdash; RJH (talk) 15:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep for the usual reasons, this is a secondary school on Navajo Indian reservation grounds. Feel free to lend me a hand with the rewrite.  Silensor 18:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand —  per TruthbringerToronto M  a  rtinp23  20:18, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand per TruthbringerToronto. Baseball,Baby!   balls  •  strikes  20:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as usual. Gazpacho 20:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - high schools are notable. Wikification is always the better option over deletion. --Daniel Olsen 00:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete directory entry with some random facts. -- Koffieyahoo 02:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  09:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Perhaps it needs work, but not deletion. Konman72 09:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow time for improvement. Calsicol 17:38, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow for continued organic growth. Bahn Mi 00:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep ok then you just volunteered to clean it up... remember afd is not to be mistaken for cleanup.  ALKIVAR ™[[Image:Radioactive.svg|18px|]] 06:10, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.