Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Paul Principles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  kur  ykh   07:36, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

St. Paul Principles

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. No assertion of notability independent from the organizations allegedly abiding by those principles. No sources. Reads like a manifesto. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 03:29, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Notability is asserted but WP:RS support is insufficient and mostly local. It's out there among the activists on but enduring significance not yet established. • Gene93k (talk) 07:42, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Verified but only by primary source. Current content would warrant deletion and with such a controversial topic should demand at least 3 independent sources (if notable). And the long-term scope of this article is questionable. Will the next RNC use the Saint Paul Principles? Would Saint Paul have any precedent over other conventions? davumaya 15:56, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, if verified, subject matter. RayAYang (talk) 18:03, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.