Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Pius X National School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Templeogue. Davewild (talk) 08:55, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

St. Pius X National School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NN primary school. We don't generally provide stand-alone articles for such schools, absent a level of coverage not present here. Epeefleche (talk) 23:50, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


 * What does the phrase "absent a level of coverage not present here" actually mean, please? — O'Dea  (talk) 13:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * In this case, it is quite evident I would think. This doesn't even have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. --Epeefleche (talk) 23:17, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment – Please do not delete until question denoted Question at Articles for deletion/Scoil Lorcáin is resolved. — O'Dea  (talk) 13:50, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't see a need -- because one editor has just now discovered how primary school AfDs are generally handled ... for years now ... to put on hold the AfD process until the editor in question is satisfied with the practice. It has been going on for years now, involving a good number of editors -- it is in fact because of that already "resolved," though the editor may not approve of the process. He is of course free to seek, at OUTCOMES or elsewhere, to seek to change the process. Epeefleche (talk) 23:17, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Epeefleche, you present yourself as one who knows about policy in this matter so please point me to the discussion of this policy. I want to see it. My questions at Articles for deletion/Scoil Lorcáin remain unanswered. Another editor pointed out that these deletions are not based on policy or guidelines but on some "consensus". I simply want to see this alleged consensus, that is all. It is a reasonable request. After all, many articles are being swept away on the basis of it, it seems. Thank you. — O'Dea  (talk) 07:59, 14 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Templeogue per long-standing precedent stated at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  23:23, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect per long-standing precedent as documented at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES -  which  is simply  a review of the facts as they  are and neither a policy  nor  a guideline. Nevertheless, the 100s of redirects in  the 'R from School' cat are ample evidence alone of the way  the community  has generally  agreed to  treat  such  creations. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:19, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.