Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Sulien or Sulian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  HurricaneFan 25  00:58, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

St. Sulien or Sulian

 * – ( View AfD View log )

While there seems to be much coverage of the church which bears his name, I have found very little that refers to the Saint himself.  M    Magister Scienta talk  (18 November 2011)  23:17, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, rename (probably to Saint Sulien).  I think there's been a general consensus over the years that all bona fide Christian saints are notable enough, and in addition to the EL provided in the article, there are at least a few sources revealed at GBooks. But "St. Sulien or Sulian" doesn't seem to be a likely title; if Sulien (as it appears from a rough Google test) is the more common spelling, the article should be renamed to Saint Sulien with Saint Sulian as a redirect. --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:39, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 19 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. I note the article is referenced. Although it's an offline source, it looks like it is devoting a number of pages to this saint. StAnselm (talk) 02:32, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Recognised saints invariably have plenty of material in print sources; apart from the cited book, Arxiloxos has found other sources. -- 203.171.196.153 (talk) 04:34, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. If sainthood is not "a well-known and significant award or honor", per WP:ANYBIO, then I don't know what is. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:20, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Subject is notable and can be referenced. Zangar (talk) 11:55, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.