Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Albans Anglican Community Church (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 03:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

St Albans Anglican Community Church
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable church per WP:ORG; has been tagged with notability since October 2006. The article was included inside a large multi-article AfD with the result "trainwrecked". Given that there appears to be no substantial progress on the page since then, bringing it to AfD vote seems appropriate. The article doesn't even give the church's location, although nom believes it is likely to be somewhere in Australia. Article is not categorised and has no pages linking to it. Paddles TC 10:00, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Comment you'll be doing the same thing for The Royal, The Royal, The Royal next... ;) Garrie 22:25, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  -- Mattinbgn/talk 12:49, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Nothing in the article indicates that it passes any guideline for notability. Just being a church is not enough. ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 14:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as NN local church. -- BPMullins | Talk 14:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources, and not even its continent is specified. Is it the one in York, Pennsylvania, the one in Largs Bay, South Australia, the one in Tokyo, the one in Ottawa, Canada etc? This could be the start of a new space saving trend: have a generic promotional article for all churches called "St. Mary's," one for all churches called "Redeemer" etc without specifying which one the article is about. Edison 16:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - appears to be description of a modest sized and very ordinary church. Clearly NN.  Peterkingiron 22:40, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Maybe someone should start a Wikichurch project for things like this. Capmango 23:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Recurring dreams 00:16, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:N Orderinchaos 02:57, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, as having no RS. news sources show a few useful results, but I'm not sure its worth the effort for a 100 person church.  Does anyone know when the church building was constructed? John Vandenberg 03:10, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, your average garden variety suburban church, by the looks of it. No indication of notability.  Lankiveil 04:57, 10 June 2007 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.