Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Budeaux Foundation Church Of England Junior School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:20, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

St Budeaux Foundation Church Of England Junior School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is non-notable and poorly written, as well as not having any sources. G S Palmer (talk) 16:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete -- The consensus is that primary schools are NN, but articles can be merged (briefly) to an article on the place where they are or one on schools in their area. However the article does not even say where the school is.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:22, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - I tried and failed to find sources beyond the school's own site and the city council. But I cleaned it up a bit. It's in Plymouth, as the person who categorised it had correctly figured out. It should be noted that the article creator is very new and probably in the age range of the school: 7–11 years. Yngvadottir (talk) 03:51, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Well, earlier versions of this article didn't adequately deal with the notable aspects of this historic school and quite a lot of sources are available. The article has now received some attention. The information could be merged to St Budeaux but the school is notable in itself and I think a merge would unbalance the article on the parish. Just as a remark, it is topics, not articles, that are considered for notability and it is not the case that junior schools are inherently non-notable but rather that their notability has to be positively established. Thincat (talk) 23:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 18:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete The only claim to notability seems to be the school's early founding. If that's notable on its own then I'll change this to a keep. The claims to being the oldest school in the area and possibly even the oldest free school in Britain are unsupported by any reliable sources I can access. They may be true, but I can't verify them. The possibly the oldest free school claim is particularly nebulous and probably shouldn't even be in the article. Meters (talk) 18:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - we generally keep schools, and this one appears to have a claim to fame -- Tawker (talk) 06:21, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * We generally don't keep articles on primary schools unless they are notable. Is the age of this school sufficient for notability? Meters (talk) 18:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern   Antarctica   ₵  03:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Generally all schools are kept regardless of notability I think. - →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  23:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.