Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Catherine's School Halifax


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Halifax Regional School Board. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

St Catherine's School Halifax

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable school. Unable to find significant third party coverage. But for the exemption from A7, I would have nominated for speedy. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   23:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Halifax Regional School Board, per our usual practice for non-high schools. If anyone wants to look at it, the school's webpage is here. --Arxiloxos (talk) 00:19, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nova Scotia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Clearly not notable. I think this might qualify for WP:PROD. mikeman67 (talk) 21:13, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Redirect Note: changed vote following Kudpung's comment, see explanation below No evidence of significant, reliable, secondary coverage. Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:35, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Redirect to Halifax Regional School Board. I couldn't find any sources providing significant coverage, so it fails WP:GNG. APerson (talk!) 12:59, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Changed vote to "Redirect" per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. APerson (talk!) 01:16, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Halifax Regional School Board per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. North America1000 00:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect of course, to Halifax Regional School Board, per our usual practice for non-high schools as clearly documented at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and thousands of such redirects. IMO, neither, , , nor have taken into account the existing consensus by precedent. AfD is not the venue for getting consensus for changing standard accepted procedures. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:27, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * , I read my initial vote more as "The content on this page in unencyclopedic" rather than "this should be a redlink." I was never opposed to a redirect, and I have no intentions of challenging consensus, even if it is only consensus by precendent. In retrospect, I can see my vote coming off that way, and therefore I have amended it to the more specific "redirect." Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

*Note for closing admin: if this is closed as 'Redirect' please remember to place the template on the redirect page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:26, 10 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.