Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Francis of Assisi School

St Francis of Assisi School
Delete - Non-notable secondary school. RedWolf 06:35, Sep 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete unless useful content is added. -- Creidieki 07:47, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Kid vanity. Geogre 13:01, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not-notable, badly written, and overly generically named.--Samuel J. Howard 13:18, Sep 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete unless enormously improved before expiration of VfD period. By the way I moved it to St Francis of Assisi Catholic Technology College because that's what the referenced website lists as the name of the school. Sorry about that, I probably shouldn't have done that. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 19:00, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Just make sure that the redirect gets deleted as well when the page does.--Samuel J. Howard 05:37, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Will do. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 15:27, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable --Improv 00:51, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has potential, even if not particularly worthwhile yet. -- Necrothesp 14:24, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * What potential, exactly, does it have? If you know of anything interesting or notable about the school, please, just add it. I looked at the school's rather problematical website and couldn't find anything, other than the correct name of the school and the headteacher's first initial. This article doesn't have enough facts in it to be a helpful start. If we delete it and someone comes by six months from now with the knowledge to write a good article, they can write it then. Starting from zero won't be any harder than starting from this. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 15:27, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see, you want to delete all stubs. Fair enough, if that's what you enjoy. -- Necrothesp 23:30, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Some stubs are useful, some are not. I want to keep the ones that are useful and delete the ones that are not. Stubs are only useful they grow into articles. This is likely to happen for an article that Wikipedia needs, in an area where we believe that there are Wikipedians with expertise who are likely to come along and fill out the stub. It's not very likely to happen with articles like this one. Have you looked at Perfect stub article? One of the most telling comments is "If nobody contributes to your stub for a few weeks, roll up your sleeves and expand it yourself." In effect, a stub is a request for someone else to do some work. In the case of a not-very-notable school, the person who wants there to be an article about the school should just write the article, not drop in a stub and expect someone else to write it for him or her, because the chances are small that there is anyone in the current pool of contributors who will know anything about that school. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 00:49, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. Almost any short and useless sub has potential, more so than an article already complete and excellent in every way. By that logic no article at all has even more potential, as a null article can develop into anything at all. So deleting this article improves its potential. Jallan 17:32, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete unless significantly improved. The stub, as it stands, has no significant information in it, and in particular no evidence of notability. Average Earthman 12:39, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  17:09, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete random secondary school. Isomorphic 18:41, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable --G Rutter 18:47, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. If Point_of_Rocks,_Wyoming, total population: 3 can be in Wikipedia then so can this--Xed 22:26, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. RickK 22:41, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)