Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Maria Goretti's RC Primary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

St Maria Goretti's RC Primary

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

PROD declined because it exists, which it does. But while there's coverage of vandalism, controversy and a fire, nothing of it is significant or in depth about the school. No indication that this school is notable in any meaningful way Star   Mississippi  18:24, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  18:24, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  18:24, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  18:24, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:50, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. It was my PROD. WP:MILL primary school. I will ensure the stuff about the lollipop lady and fires goes on the Cranhill page. Crowsus (talk) 18:52, 5 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - non-notable primary school.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:41, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete since the school clearly isn't notable. The only thing worth retaining is the incident with the lollipop lady, but that doesn't directly relate to the school. So it's fine to mention it in the Cranhill article instead of this one. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Very rare that primary schools are notable enough to have articles of their own, and I do not see anything here that would make this an exception. As stated above, if reference to the lollipop lady incident is desired, then it could be accommodated adequately in the Cranhill article. Dunarc (talk) 21:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Another PROD removed per "it exists" by Special:Contributions/73.170.77.46. The IP appears to have backed off but if they come back somebody needs to talk to them. casualdejekyll  15:43, 8 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.