Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Peters, Leicester, Leicestershire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. I note that the article is largely a copyvio of this link, and so Speedy Deletion Criteria G12 (Copyvio) may apply as well. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 14:27, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

St Peters, Leicester, Leicestershire

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Seems to be non-notable. Previously speedy-delete tagged for A1, but then the article was expanded by author. I'm not opposed to keeping the article if it's revamped and references added (there appear to be a couple of refs out there after Google searching it). But I'm bringing this to the community because of possible non-notability concerns.  Jamie  S93  17:52, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Make a Stub – Sorry to say, the town and medieval church do deserve an article here at Wikipedia. Sorry to say, this is not the article.  Typically, I would try and save it, but this needs to be totally scraped – research done – and rewritten from the first word to the last period.  ShoesssS Talk 19:16, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. In the current state unsalvageable. No sources, filled with OR and terribly written. Moreover, the subject is very poorly indentified. Are they talking about a city neighborhood? If yes, why is it notable? Nsk92 (talk) 03:26, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. If there is a settlement by this name, then it is legitimate, but the article as it currently stands is merely about a council estate, i.e., a block of flats and some houses which isn't at all notable, and the article is basically an essayist commentary WP:COATRACK on the estate's gang problems. WilliamH (talk) 14:34, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:N.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 14:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.