Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Willibrord with All Saints, Newcastle Quayside


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to All Saints' Church, Newcastle upon Tyne. Spartaz Humbug! 04:41, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

St Willibrord with All Saints, Newcastle Quayside

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article is about the current occupiers of a deconsecrated church. I do not think it is sufficiently notable as an article. I have just added All Saints' Church, Newcastle upon Tyne complete with its history – there is a note at the end about the current occupiers, which should be sufficient. And also a link to St Willibrord. Twiceuponatime (talk) 08:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 09:07, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 09:07, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment The article is partly about the church building, and articles on historic buildings are usually kept, provided their existence can be verified. This article cites no sources, though. Moreover, there seems to be disagreement about the location of this church. I just declined a speedy for St Willibrord with All Saints, Byker on procedural reasons and discovered it previously had the same content as this one. In order to ensure factual accuracy, I therefore
 * Co-nominate St Willibrord with All Saints, Byker (This one is currently a redirect, and therefore in the wrong forum. Any suggestion on how to resolve this better is appreciated.) --Pgallert (talk) 11:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep whilst the sources on Google are far from ideal, it does appear that this geographical site exists. ---- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment -- The question is ultimately whehter this is an architecturally notable building. The article is at presetn porrly presented, but that can be corrected.  Peterkingiron (talk) 20:47, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The building is one of five Round churches in England so qualifies on that ground; it is also one of the Grade I listed buildings in Newcastle so also qualifies on that. The article on the church is at All Saints' Church, Newcastle upon Tyne - the question is whether the 'occupiers' of the church also qualify for an article. Twiceuponatime (talk) 08:22, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 21:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. All the relevant content seems to already exist at All Saints' Church, Newcastle upon Tyne. -- Radagast3 (talk) 01:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete While the church building is notable, that is covered by the main article All Saints' Church, Newcastle upon Tyne as noted by User:twiceuponatime. The 'St.Willibrod' part is the current occupiers, and they haven't demonstrated notability.  A redirect to the All Saints article would make sense.  David V Houston (talk) 02:15, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.