Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stabenfeldt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete all. seresin | wasn't he just...? 21:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Stabenfeldt


Part of an organized campaign to spam "Pony Book Club" across the internet, see. And besides, the publishing company, Stabenfeldt, is just not notable - there's only one source in the 13 ghits. MER-C 12:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Delete per nomination.Henry Merrivale (talk) 23:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  14:58, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all - advertising. JohnCD (talk) 17:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete but allow recreation if a good, well-sourced article can be written. This is pretty clearly part of a spam campaign, and whoever is in charge of PONY/Stabenfeldt's online marketing needs a good stern talking-to.  That said, I do think both the company and club are notable enough (especially if the 200K membership number can be sourced) and could probably be a pretty decent article if written by someone without a COI. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  19:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.