Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stable Micro Systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 01:34, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Stable Micro Systems

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Promotional article which would require a complete rewrite to meet guidelines. Not clear how this subject might meet WP:CORP though, I'm finding zero mentions of this company in google news and the book reference might demonstrate the notability of that employee but not the company as a whole. RadioFan (talk) 13:39, 18 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —MuffledThud (talk) 14:02, 18 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - failes WP:CORP, also note WP:COI: creator's name is also the name of a manager at the company. MuffledThud (talk) 14:02, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, makes no minimal case of importance, and unambiguous advertising: a leading manufacturer.... marketed on every continent through a network of hand-picked distributors and agents... - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:56, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy per Smerdis. Dalekusa (talk) 16:33, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy And I think we might have WP:SNOW near. --Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! (talk) 19:17, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment In development of this article the following articles were used as a guide: Instron, Brookfield Engineering, Zwick Roell Group. The content is similar, the external links are similar.  Stable Micro Systems article at least gives a background to the scientific area of application.  Stable Micro Systems is also as notable other than than it is a UK company.  Please suggest changes or give reason why the afore-mentioned articles should not be deleted. Jo Smewing (talk) 08:30, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment While I appreciate that you looked to elsewhere for a guide in creating this article, other articles are not what is used to determine whether a particular article should be deleted or not. Notability guidelines are the only guide used.--RadioFan (talk) 13:21, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedily if possible: appears to be clear advertising, with no evidence of notability. Robofish (talk) 21:56, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.