Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stablepedia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Dakota 18:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Stablepedia
Cool little site, but unfortunately fails WP:WEB by a landslide. Zero reliable sources on google: [Check Google hits]. Was previously CSD'd as A7 (though I have no idea why, as CSD A7 doesn't include sites). Let the debate decide whether to keep once and for all. (|--  UlT i MuS  03:50, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * To be honest, I sort of just assumed its notability since it was linked to from Wikipedia. I noticed it was linked to from there, but not yet created, so I created it. Perhaps if it turns out that the site is non-notable, the link should be removed from Wikipedia.
 * Delete - I tried but I couldn't find any sources other than blogs and digg. (Side note: CSD A7 includes websites now - it was a recent change if I recall correctly. ) Crystallina 04:15, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads-up. It makes cleaning out the crap a lot easier. (|--   UlT i MuS  04:19, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --User:Arnzy (talk • contribs) 04:24, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. May be worth mentioning to wikitech-l as an unauthorized remote loader - it doesn't appear to have been mentioned to them yet. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 06:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 07:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. On an unrelated note, this thing sucks. I checked one article, and it went to an earlier version, apparently considering the addition of a category to be vandalism. I had it pull up one of my user pages, and it considered a restructuring of content to be vandalism. Nice job, Stablepedia. GassyGuy 09:10, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Hehe. It considered my addition of a PD-US-Gov image to Atiku Abubakar vandalism.  No idea why.  ergot 17:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Reluctant Delete - sounds like a nice site but fails WP:WEB. Matthuxtable 13:18, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:WEB. Being totally useless and mooching off Wikipedia are hardly endearing it to me either. -- I sl a y So lo mo n  |  t a l k  16:19, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Maybe it'll be appropriate in the future, but for now Delete. ReverendG 21:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB; concur with User:IslaySolomon. ergot 17:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.