Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StackCommerce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:34, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

StackCommerce

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No substantial references to show notability -- the Forbes article is essentially a press release, by a "contributor", which Forbes properly annotates as " Opinions expressed by Forbes commentators are their own" -- ditto for TechCrunch--  and everything else a notice. Accepted from AfC.  DGG ( talk ) 05:36, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Question for nominator. Are we to understand that "Accepted from AfC" is a reason for deletion?  NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- does not meet WP:NCORP and significant RS coverage to meet WP:CORPDEPTH not found. What comes up is routine notices and WP:SPIP sources. WP:TOOSOON per review of available sources: the company exists but have not accomplished anything significant just yet. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.