Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacy Kessler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 05:02, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Stacy Kessler

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD. This is a self-promotional article written by the individual herself. She has had small roles in some red linked projects, and a two episode walk-on role in a reality TV show. The references included are bare mentions and are not the siginificant coverage required to meet WP:ENT. As it is an autobiography, there is also the concern that large parts of it consist of original research. Kessler may one day score the types of roles required to meet notability criteria, at which time someone uninvolved will likely create her article, but she's not there yet. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:26, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Per WP:COI Might be worthwhile to determine if she is notable for other reasons.  CycloneGU (talk) 20:45, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet general notability guidelines. gnews archive brings back nothing --CutOffTies (talk) 20:57, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete for failing WP:ENT and WP:GNG. She does have some minor coverage for her work in Millionaire Matchmaker, but not enough to push the bar.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:30, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.