Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stadium Flowers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 05:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Stadium Flowers

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable company. - Just because it is the claimed to be the largest florist in an area is not notable on its own. Failed to find anything reliable 3rd party on google. noq (talk) 19:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as being the largest florist in Snohomish County isn't grounds for notability. Wikipedia isn't the white pages. B figura  (talk) 20:48, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This has been speedied before, as I recall. The largest in Snohomish County, with two branches? If I can get hold of my cousin in Snohomish, I'll see what they say. (Not guaranteeing anything - could be anywhere between New York and Korea.) My SD was declined this time on the grounds of 'largest'. Perhaps this will lay the article to rest. Apart from non-notable, has a distinct taste of spam for me. Peridon (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Your speedy was declined because it does not meet speedy criteria. The subject is probably not notable; but they made a claim to notability in the article, and that makes A7 in applicable. I can only delete under A7 if I completely ignore policy. Please read the speedy criteria more carefully. KillerChihuahua ?!?Advice 09:06, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I have read the criteria - and note the current version of the SD tag contains the word 'credibly' which I do not see fitting here. Also, I said 'before' referring to a version of the article deleted prior to the appearance of the current one. Peridon (talk) 18:28, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.